Is Cosmopolitan UK Going to Remove This Example of Group Libel Now That The Source Admits It Is False?

UK ‘journalism‘…

Murderer Ian Huntley wants to change gender so he┬ácan live in a women’s prison

…certainly seems to be TERF-infected.

The now-proven-false story of that particular male inmate allegedly desiring to transition was not merely false, not merely inflammatory against that particular inmate but instead an act of group libel against all trans people everywhere – created, perpetrated and propagated with the sole intent of driving negative publicity against all trans people everywhere, but particularly against trans women.

Advertisements

“TERF” is No More of a Slur to TERFs than “NATO” is to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

The words the letters T, E, R and F represent are a substantive description of what TERFs are and want.

Buying the false claim that “TERF” is a slur is tantamount to siding with TERFs and their bigotry.

But, if you claim that the application of “TERF” to you is a slur, then you must disavow at least one component of the term as applied to you – you know, somewhat akin to crushing at least one element of a cause of action in order to get a case tossed on summary judgment.

So, lets get to the analysis…

Are you seriously claiming that “Trans-Excluding” – the “T” and the “E” – do not apply to you?

Well, because you defamatorily assert that trans women are men you want to exclude trans women from certain spaces, right? If so, how precisely do you credibly deny that “Trans-Excluding” applies to you?

We’re halfway there.

Want to quit while you’re behind?

Are you claiming that “Radical Feminist” (and or RadFem) does not apply to you?

This is a bit trickier – though only a bit.

GOP women certainly won’t claim it (except selectively – namely to get on TV to bash women’s equality; I’m looking at YOU Kellyanne Conjob!). But as for the reminder of the TERFs…

Don’t all of you wear “RadFem” like a crown?

So…

That’s a “T,” an “E,” an “R,” and an “F.”

TERF!

So, TERFs, you’ve lost your case, conclusively.

So much so that an assertion by a TERF (which, as we’ve just proven, is not a slur) that “TERF” is a slur should be regarded as legally defamatory to the person accurately applying “TERF” (which, again, as we’ve just proven, is not a slur) to the TERF (which, to repeat, is not a slur.)

Congratulations, Wisconsin!

g1

Yes, there have been GENDA bill in New York before.

g2

But this one became law.

So…

Congratulations, Wisconsin! You’re now the only remaining state whose state civil rights laws give non-trans gay men, lesbians and bisexuals the special right to discriminate against trans people.

I guess it makes sense.

After all, you were the first to do it – back in 1982.

Do you feel as special as Roger Stone does after getting a Nixon tattoo?

Philadelphia Gay News Lets Cis Transphobic Lesbian Write About Trans Issues While Better-Qualified Trans Writers Remain Unemployed – Again

And the money shot?

BrownstainTrumpCo

She couldn’t be bothered to include any words from any of the trans people who would be directly affected by TrumpCo’s smells-like-TERF-spirit policy.

Believe Like Its 2007!

SolmoneseBelieve2

The Next “Silenced” TERF Academic Will Be The First

If your trans-exterminationistic cries of having been “silenced” are emanating from a tenured position in academia that equally- and/or better-qualified trans women were never even considered for, then you just might be an over-privileged bigot.

Twenty Years (Well, Lacking Three Months Anyway) and Not a Damn Thing Has Changed

For purposes of this discussion, whether the victim mentioned in this item (which appeared in the October 22, 1998 edition of the Wisconsin Light) actually identified as a “transvestite” or was actually a trans woman – or was anything in between – is irrelevant.

WILight-1998-WIHateCrime

ALL aspects of the T were then, and still are, strangers to Wisconsin state law.

Thank you, Gay, Inc.!

#sarcasm