How to Make Me Author a Post Fully and Completely Supporting Caitlyn Jenner?

Give proven liar and con-artist Michael Bailey a platform to attempt to re-animate ‘autogynephilia.’

Michael Bailey is professor of psychology at Northwestern University and one of the more prolific sex researchers in the world. He kindly accepted my invitation to discuss autogynephilia in light of Caitlyn Jenner’s transition.

Who is “He”?

He’s Warren Throckmorton – and he doesn’t bother telling his readers that Michael Bailey (and his publisher) should have been prosecuted for fraud by labeling The Man Who Would be Queen as ‘science.’

He’s Warren Throckmorton – and he doesn’t bother telling his readers that Michael Bailey’s fraudulent ‘science’ was based on hanging around Chicago drag bars and informally interviewing a grand total of seven women.

He’s Warren Throckmorton – and he doesn’t bother telling his readers that Michael Bailey’s other ‘subject’ in The Man Who Would be Queen didn’t exist.

He’s Warren Throckmorton – and he doesn’t bother telling his readers how Michael Bailey mysteriously ceased being chair of the Northwestern University psychology department in the aftermath of The Man Who Would be Queen being conclusively debunked.

He’s Warren Throckmorton – and he doesn’t bother telling his readers that the career that Alice Dreger has manufactured for herself over the last decade of claiming that Bailey has not been proven to be a fraud is even more of a fraud than Bailey’s career.

WT: Why is there so little media coverage of the autogynephilia angle?
MB: I think it’s a mixture of ignorance, political correctness, and fear. Most journalists know what they know from the media and from transgender activists — who do not mention autogynephilia

Well, real media doesn’t mention it for the same reason it doesn’t mention flat-earth ‘science’ and eugenics.

And transgender activists do mention it – but we simply point out that its been conclusively proven to be as fraudulent as, well, flat-earth ‘science’ and eugenics.

Oh yeh…

Caitlyn Jenner…

I fully and completely support her.

Advertisements

Life is So Easy For Self-Declared ‘Ethicists’

No responsibilities and…

well, lets just stick with that: No responsibility, no responsibility at all.

From Cristan Williams at TransAdvocate who, apparently, with a handful of phone calls, does more actual journalism than the Toronto Star does in, well, who knows how long:

On Saturday, the Toronto Star’s “ethics” journalist, Ken Gallinger, unquestioningly published the incredible claim that an elderly Toronto women was hit on in the YMCA women’s locker room by a male-bodied individual who was walking around the women’s locker room fully nude, replete with erection.

The claim is a hoax. We can add this fake incident to the growing list of other fake incidents:

How do we know that the Toronto ‘incident’ didn’t happen?

First:

When Autumn Sandeen wrote Gallinger about the article, Gallinger claimed no journalistic duty to fact check any claim saying, “It is, of course, not possible for me to substantiate most of the stories I’m told, and frankly I don’t try — my general policy is to deal with issues as they are presented…” To seemingly make the case that he wasn’t entirely derelict in his journalistic duties, Gallinger claimed that he did at least check to make sure “that the e-mail address from which it came was valid.” What Gallinger utterly failed to do, was pick up the phone and simply call the YMCA to verify any aspect of this anonymous story.

No journalistic duty to fact check any claim?

Who does Gallinger think he is?  The JohnThe Bil?

Clearly he’s not Cristan, because…

Since Gallinger wasn’t willing to fact check any of these claims, I contacted every Toronto YMCA with a pool and guess what?

No complaint or even rumor of anything like this exists in Toronto area YMCAs. Every Toronto area YMCA was shocked to learn that an unsubstantiated claim like this was propagated by the Toronto Star. Every Toronto area YMCA confirmed that nobody had made any complaint concerning anything even remotely similar to the claim made in the Toronto Star.

Cristan has posted audio and transcripts thereof.

Forward to your favorite christianist-lovin’ TERFs (Or is it TERF-lovin’ christianists?  Its so hard to tell these days), so they can get their stories straight (pun intended) next time they decide to commit group libel against trans people.

Countdown to Homophobe Elisa Chan Being Crowned the New Radphlegm Heroine in 3…2…1….

From the San Antonio Express-News:

Former District 3 Councilwoman Leticia Ozuna is calling for the resignation of District 9 Councilwoman Elisa Chan, who was captured making disparaging remarks about the LGBT community in a secret recording of a May staff meeting.

Chan and aides were strategizing how to oppose a pending update to the city’s nondiscrimination ordinance, which would add protections for sexual orientation and gender identity. Former Chan aide James Stevens released the recording to the San Antonio Express-News last week.

In the recording, Chan discusses Ozuna’s family life. Ozuna, who lost re-election in May, is married to Sophia Parafina, a transgender woman; they have two children.

The Express-News had previously withheld that portion of the recording to protect Ozuna’s privacy. Ozuna agreed this week to address the portion regarding her family.

“I am terribly saddened to learn that me and my family were used as subjects of ridicule and criticism by Elisa Chan and her staff,” Ozuna said in a statement.

More details:

Brian Chasnoff, the Express-News reporter who published the original audio, now reports.

“That lady was born a man. So that marriage is still valid in the state of Texas,” one of Chan’s aides says in the new audio.

“So what kind of marriage is that?,” Chan responds during the meeting in her San Antonio, Texas city council office.

And now, in accurately summarizing Elisa Chan’s post-exposure gameplan, longtime Express-News columnist Rick Casey provides irrefutable proof that Chan – homophobia in tow – will be welcomed with open arms by trans-exterminationist radphlegm lesbians (if she hasn’t been already):

At her news conference, for which her staff recruited a crowd of supporters, Chan read from a prepared statement: “I stand strong in my First Amendment right to freedom of speech and our right to privacy. As an immigrant, I consider this the greatest privilege of being a U.S. citizen.”

It’s a common play-the-martyr tactic. Suggest that people who are appalled by your utterings are violating your rights by trying to shut you up.

Late-70s San Francisco had the  Castro Clone male.

Trans-exterminationist radphlegmery has the Bailey-Dreger Clone martyr.

Should it ever be revealed that Chan’s statement at that news conference was actually written for her by Michael Bailey, er…, Alice Dreger, er… Julie Burchill, er…, Victoria Brownworth, er………………..

I know, I know….

“When,” not “if”….

Remember Walter White’s ‘Fugue State’ from ‘Breaking Bad’?

Remember how it was a sham?

He thought he was a woman trapped in a man’s body — but it turns out he’s “just another boring straight guy.”

ABC News editor Don Ennis strolled into the newsroom in May wearing a little black dress and an auburn wig and announced he was transgender and splitting from his wife. He wanted to be called Dawn.

But now he says he suffered from a two-day bout of amnesia that has made him realize he wants to live his life again as Don.

“I accused my wife of playing some kind of cruel joke, dressing me up in a wig and bra and making fake ID’s with the name ‘Dawn’ on it. Seriously,” Ennis wrote in a memo he posted to the newsroom bulletin board Friday, explaining his shock after he woke up from what he called a “transient global amnesia” last month

Remember now?

And People Like Her Are Why So Few Trans Women Are Ever Allowed to Become “Established” Scholars

The publisher Routledge is following standard Gay, Inc. operating procedure: Everything about trans existence not only can be questioned but must be questioned, and trans people have no standing to even suggest that legitimizing an anti-trans work is the moral and scientific equivalent of legitimizing any given anti-gay tract by any given talking-head du jour from NOM or Focus on the Family.

On 5 July, we received a reply from Jeremy North, Managing Director of Books at Taylor & Francis. He assured us of Francis & Taylor’s high academic standards and rigorous vetting process and wrote:

At the top of our criteria in assessing suitability for publication is content that meets the highest standards of academic scholarship. Sheila Jeffreys is an established, albeit sometimes controversial, scholar. Her proposal was subjected to multiple peer review and we are confident on the basis of the scholarly feedback and the author’s track record that is should be published.

The reply in question was to a letter by Dallas Denny and Jamison Green questioning the decision by Routledge (an imprint of Taylor & Francis) that the world needed yet another book legitimizing trans-exterminationism – this time by transphobes Sheila Jeffreys and Lorene Gottschalk.

Anyone who believes that any of the ‘peers’ on that ‘peer review’ did contain any trans people and did not contain one or more TERFs needs – or perhaps has already had – a lobotomy.

When North’s employer is willing to similarly legitimize works questioning the existence of homosexuality and/or opposing feminism, I’ll stop looking upon his response as a fetid turd-filled lie that easily could have been a slightly-reworked draft of the stock responses to a certain ‘peer reviewed’ work by a certain ‘ established, albeit sometimes controversial, scholar’ a decade ago.

Remembering Victoria Brownworth

If you’re having trouble remembering her, Cristan Williams has some pointers to aid you.

A Well-Professed ‘Award Winning’ Lesbian Writer Should Have Some Familiarity With How Groundless Libel Suits Can End Up (Part Two)

Cristan Williams documents:

BBB-tw3

Cristan’s summation:

I might be some nobody blogger, but even I know that before I make a fact assertion (especially about something like this), I’d better have objective evidence to back it up.

There’s a reason Brownworth refuses to share her documentation of my threats: it doesn’t exist.