The words the letters T, E, R and F represent are a substantive description of what TERFs are and want.
Buying the false claim that “TERF” is a slur is tantamount to siding with TERFs and their bigotry.
But, if you claim that the application of “TERF” to you is a slur, then you must disavow at least one component of the term as applied to you – you know, somewhat akin to crushing at least one element of a cause of action in order to get a case tossed on summary judgment.
So, lets get to the analysis…
Are you seriously claiming that “Trans-Excluding” – the “T” and the “E” – do not apply to you?
Well, because you defamatorily assert that trans women are men you want to exclude trans women from certain spaces, right? If so, how precisely do you credibly deny that “Trans-Excluding” applies to you?
We’re halfway there.
Want to quit while you’re behind?
Are you claiming that “Radical Feminist” (and or RadFem) does not apply to you?
This is a bit trickier – though only a bit.
GOP #HeritageTERFoundation women certainly won’t claim it (except selectively – namely to get on TV to bash women’s equality; I’m looking at YOU Kellyanne Conjob!). But as for the reminder of the TERFs…
Don’t all of you wear “RadFem” like a crown?
So…
That’s a “T,” an “E,” an “R,” and an “F.”
TERF!
So, TERFs, you’ve lost your case, conclusively.
So much so that an assertion by a TERF (which, as we’ve just proven, is not a slur) that “TERF” is a slur should be regarded as legally defamatory to the person accurately applying “TERF” (which, again, as we’ve just proven, is not a slur) to the TERF (which, to repeat, is not a slur.)
Leave a comment
No comments yet.
Leave a reply, but don't be a troll. Have a nice day!