Funny, But I See No Maryland State Law Decisions Cited

From an amicus brief filed in support of Leyth Jamal in her action against Saks:

NotMaryland

The theory of federal trans coverage under federal sex discrimination law being utilized by Ms. Jamal is not yet a fully settled principle of law (meaning that it may be many things and indeed is many things but robust is not one of them), but it is a real theory.

Why?

The federal and state court decisions being cited are real.

The theory that there was Maryland trans coverage under Maryland state law prior to the effective date of the 2014 gender identity law was not a real theory.

Why?

Well…

I see a Massachusetts court decision…

I see a New Jersey court decision…

But do any of you see any Maryland sex discrimination court decisions?

Of course you don’t.

Because there weren’t any.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a reply, but don't be a troll. Have a nice day!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s