“‘Rising Star?’ More Like a Rising Boil”

Now, in a week in which the U.S. Supreme Court illegitimately eviscerated the Voting Rights Act but legitimately eviscerated the Defense of Marriage Act, who could that have been a comment about?

Following in the footsteps of his malignant father, he gives “Bought Bitch Mitch” McConnell serious competition for the title of Kentuckian most likely to be certified insane.  He has demonstrated, once again, that my opinion of him is correct.

Who?

Why Rand ‘Aqua Buddah’ Paul, of course.

[I]t’s difficult to reconcile the media adulation and Rand Paul’s occasional crackpot tendencies.Earlier today, for example, the senator appeared on Glenn Beck’s show to discuss, among other things, the Supreme Court’s ruling striking down the Defense of Marriage Act. The host suggested the ruling could lead to polygamy: “If you change one variable — man and a woman to man and man, and woman and woman — you cannot then tell me that you can’t logically tell me you can’t change the other variable — one man, three women. Uh, one woman, four men…. If I’m a devout Muslim and I come over here and I have three wives, who are you to say if I’m an American citizen, that I can’t have multiple marriages.”

For Paul, this seemed perfectly sensible. In fact, the senator went even further than Beck. Here’s the entirety of Rand Paul’s response, in which the senator said he’s “kind of with” the unhinged host.

I think this is the conundrum and gets back to what you were saying in the opening — whether or not churches should decide this. But it is difficult because if we have no laws on this people take it to one extension further. Does it have to be humans?

What gets me is that, as a radical, unhinged, sell-the-sidewalks, the-Civil-Rights-Act-of-1964-is-unconstitutional libertarian, why isn’t he on the side of Muslim multiple marriages? I mean, after all, he’s perfectly fine with government having no power to stop corporations from keeping women (and men) in slavery – so why shouldn’t some of the Muslim oligarchs who control some of the most most powerful corporations in the world be able to reap the benefits of libertarian fascism via marriage(s)?

Animals…..?

I could act like a Republican and lie, making the allegation that Idiot should know, being a product of breeding with animals himself, but that would be a grave injustice.  I have far too much respect for animals to believe that one would mate with Ron Paul.  Animals have better taste than that!

Indeed.

1 Comment

  1. I’m willing to believe there’s some animal DNA in Rands’ gene pool. You can see the jackass pretty clearly.


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a reply, but don't be a troll. Have a nice day!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s