Seriously.
I’m still trans and I’m still liberal as ever. But I do mean what I say in the title to this piece.
By now I’m sure we’ve all heard what we all could have predicted: that the Log Cabin Republicans would come up with some rationale – written in skunk urine on parchment made from Terry Dolan’s rotting corpse – for them to endorse Donald Trump for re-election.
What fewer people (at least outside of Texas) may have heard is that a gay Republican who maintains his wealth by accepting money from LGBTQ Texans – you know, a group from whom, collectively, the Trump Administration is trying to strip all civil rights – via his ownership of a San Antonio gay bar is going to one-up that self-hating Trump-endorsement by running for Congress…
as a Republican of course.
Now, the likelihood of my voting for any Republican is slim to none, but even I’ll concede there are a handful of sane people out there who still want to hold on to their Republican Party.
The problem is: Those who were in office aren’t any more; and when they were they either didn’t or couldn’t exercise any control over the radical christianists who controlled the legislative bodies they served in. (As for other positions? The judge I clerked for and the Republican governor who appointed him have both long since retired.)
But, again, there once were a handful of such folks. I went to great pains to call as many out – positively – as I could in my doctoral dissertation on transgender legal history.
And sometimes the past isn’t so far in the past.
Bruce Rauner, the hetero Republican, now-former governor of Illinois, signed a very positive transgender birth certificate bill into law in 2017 – at great political risk to himself. A christofascist tried to primary him last year – using the birth certificate law as a weapon against him – and damn near succeeded. (He then lost the general election to the Democratic candidate.)
The problem was that Rauner had enough of the usual GOP baggage (he was a vicious union buster – among other things – who essentially bought the governorship in 2014; think Scott Walker with the big personal bankroll that Walker did not have but without the rabid Republican legislature that Walker did have in Wisconsin) that I could not in good conscience vote for him even though his signing the trans bill was a very, very good thing, something I’d be willing to genuinely thank him for should the chance ever arise.
I don’t believe for one second a cis gay male Republican would have signed that bill. And I’m even less willing to believe a cis lesbian Republican would have.
And that should expose the Log Cabin Con to anyone who is paying attention.
For decades now, Log Cabin-oids have been whining about how LGBTQ people who live in the real world won’t support them. Log Cabin-oids assert that only Log Cabin-oids can change the Republican party – to make it less toxic for LGBTQ people.
Therefore, we LGBTQ people who live in the real world owe them our votes.
But look at them – and what gay Republicans actually stand for.
They’re not better than moderate/sane straight Republicans.
They’re not even better than the christofascists.
At the end of the day, they’re worse.
There is no anti-LGBTQ policy that gay Republicans will not either support or be an apologist for – either directly or indirectly. The endorsement of Donald Trump for re-election in 2020 by itself proves the accuracy of the previous sentence – but there are decades and decades of self-loathing and selling-out that preceded it.
When someone takes great pains to tell you what they are by demonstrating what they are, believe them.
Anyone running as a Republican now is telling you that they are, by extension, Donald Trump.
Believe them.
Any gay person running as a Republican now is telling you they will sell you out for personal gain; that they will trade your ability to work and even your very life for a tax cut.
Believe them.
Vote accordingly.
And spend your money accordingly.
August 19, 2019
Categories: gay transphobia, History, Political constipation, The Aristocrats . . Author: Katrina Rose . Comments: Leave a comment